The Ethiopia-Djibouti railway, Africa’s first modern electrified rail route, was built by Chinese firms. Photo: Xinhua
- Ethiopia’s struggles to service loans that paid for railways and other infrastructure are complicated by conflict and coronavirus
- But some unprofitable projects also raise questions over the risks involved for Chinese lenders
. In the capital Addis Ababa, evidence of Chinese money and influence is everywhere: roads, skyscrapers, airports and an electrified railway.
Ethiopia is the second-largest recipient of Chinese loans in Africa after Angola. It received US$13.7 billion of the US$148 billion in loans that China advanced to African countries between 2000 and 2018, according to the China Africa Research Initiative at Johns Hopkins University.
The money has gone into building roads, power plants, railway lines, sugar processing plants and industrial zones.
Aspiring to become a major middle-income country by 2025, the landlocked Ethiopia spent US$4.5 billion to build a railway line from Addis Ababa to the ports of its coast-facing neighbour Djibouti. Construction was completed in 2016, providing a gateway to the Red Sea, but US$2.49 billion of the cost had been borrowed from Eximbank.
Commercial operation of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti railway did not begin until January 2018, because of delays in putting up power infrastructure.
A decade on, she said, those railways had in many cases endured profitability issues because the economic rationale for building them from scratch had been very thin, and they would always need to be subsidised.
Ethiopia’s railway was not supposed to make a profit but “was meant to stimulate wider economic growth through industrial development and land investment”, Chen said.
The pandemic and collapsing global trade, along with Ethiopia’s domestic security issues, have made the prospect of railway infrastructure investment paying off even more remote.
“For railways, it seems, the light at the end of the tunnel remains dim,” Chen said.
“China’s rapid expansion of overseas development finance in Africa and elsewhere to large, risky railway projects does not seem to have paid off.”
Ethiopia had previously spent US$475 million building the Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, which was 85 per cent financed by Eximbank and opened in 2015.
Istvan Tarrosy, director of the Africa Research Centre at Hungary’s University of Pecs, who has conducted studies on Ethiopia’s railways, said the projects had faced numerous challenges, including “a constant lack of income”.
“With very low ticket prices, overcrowded and limited trams, and power issues, it [was] difficult to generate sufficient income” from the light rail, he said.
Tarrosy said the Ethiopian Railway Corporation had a US$3.7 billion debt as a result of building the Ethiopia-Djibouti railway and began to repay the loan before it could begin commercial operations.
Even before the coronavirus struck, the railway projects were not generating enough revenue to pay back the loans used to build them. The electrified Standard Gauge Railway reported US$40 million in revenue in 2019, but its operating costs were US$70 million, according to official data.
Ethiopia has sought debt relief from China and other Group of 20 nations to cope with the impact of the pandemic. It is also seeking to restructure Chinese loans for the railway line, and in January said it intended to seek restructuring of public external debt via the G20.
Debt negotiations with Chinese lenders is on top of a 2018 agreement allowing the Standard Gauge Railway’s loan repayment to be made over 30 rather than 10 years.
The Tigray conflict has prompted the government to divert resources to fight rebels in the country’s north, where thousands of people including civilians have been killed.
Despite the risks, Tarrosy said it remained in China’s interests to continue to fund rail projects in Africa. But he expected Chinese lenders to adjust their approach.
“I expect Chinese actors, both state-owned and private, will be more cautious, and keep an eye on what competitors … offer to African governments for their infrastructure plans,” he said.
“This might make it more difficult for African governments to get the resources they need.”
This article has been adapted from its original source
Statements, comments or opinions published in this column are of those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Warsan magazine. Warsan reserves the right to moderate, publish or delete a post without prior consultation with the author(s). To publish your article or your advertisement contact our editorial team at: firstname.lastname@example.org